In Regard To Norwegian Mass Murderer Anders Breivik as posed by countless Media around the World:
1. Is He A Terrorist?
2. Is He A Fundamentalist Christian?
3. Is He Simply A Christian?
4. Is He An Athiest?
5. Is He A Conservative?
6. Is He A Nazis?
7. Is He Part Of A Terrorist Cell Network?
8. Is He Insane?
In posing these questions, this self same left leaning Media miss the Answer in all of this - Breivik is simply a nut-bar who killed innocent children, women and men for his own delusional purposes.
The Media is anxiously looking for a counter-balance to the off stated claim that Islamists are the bad guys. They so desperately want to include the Right in the mix so that when extreme muslims carry out their vile acts - the righteous Left can come back with "they are no different from the violent Right".
In that, the Left is partially correct - violence on the part of anyone be they from the Right - the Middle - the Left - or from Religious Zealots - or from whomever - is always wrong.
But their trying to paint this Madman with a right wing or extreme Christian Label - is simply reprehensible.
The Left cannot continue to ignore the vile actions of the Extreme Islamists because, unlike Breivik - their actions are coordinated, often State Based and founded upon a twisted interpretation of the Koran. Moreover, it is not religion that fuels the Muslim fundamentalists - but rather it is power - the power to control their own peoples and subject others to their Will.
Who then is Anders Breivik?
Answer: He is a lost deranged soul trying desperately to be noticed. In so doing he has gained Infamy rather than Fame.
As I see it...
'K.D. Galgher'
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
NYCOLE TURMEL....
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING !!!!
First let me say that we are all saddened by Jack Layton's recent diagnosis and wish him well.
That said, anyone expecting his return to Parliament is simply kidding himself.
The issue I want to deal with though - is why in the world did Layton pick Turmel as his stand-in.
Turmel was the fire-brand PSAC Unionist that Shepparded the Pay Equity Settlement that cost the Feds $3.6 Billion - despite the fact that public servants are the best paid workers in the land.
More to the point, she is a Separatist Supporter even during her term as PSAC Leader - you know, PSAC - Canada's major Public Service Union. Conflict of Interest anyone?
With a bunch of rabble in their Caucus - many of whom are blatant Separatists like Turmel herself - Why, would Layton put her in Charge?
Agreed, he is thin on the ground for a replacement - but does have a couple - e.g. Paul Dewar and Libby Davies - who he could count on to provide a more balanced - ie Quebec / Rest of Canada Approach.
I predict Ms. Turmel will pander to the Quebec Caucus and in so doing will turn off the NDP base outside of that Province. Don't forget, it is that base which has stuck with the NDP through thick and thin. The others are simply new-comers who came on board through the unexpected collapse of the BLOC. It remains to be seen how long this new contingent will last but the smart money is that it will not survive the next Election.
In addition when we are speaking about Pandering - Turmel will naturally promote the welfare (?) of the Federal Public Service. Now there is a subject that will warm the hearts of the average Canadian.
So there you have it - some choice.
The odds from the beginning of Layton holding his motley crew together were long - his appointment of Turmel will simply make those odds impossible.
As I see it...
'K.D. Galagher'
First let me say that we are all saddened by Jack Layton's recent diagnosis and wish him well.
That said, anyone expecting his return to Parliament is simply kidding himself.
The issue I want to deal with though - is why in the world did Layton pick Turmel as his stand-in.
Turmel was the fire-brand PSAC Unionist that Shepparded the Pay Equity Settlement that cost the Feds $3.6 Billion - despite the fact that public servants are the best paid workers in the land.
More to the point, she is a Separatist Supporter even during her term as PSAC Leader - you know, PSAC - Canada's major Public Service Union. Conflict of Interest anyone?
With a bunch of rabble in their Caucus - many of whom are blatant Separatists like Turmel herself - Why, would Layton put her in Charge?
Agreed, he is thin on the ground for a replacement - but does have a couple - e.g. Paul Dewar and Libby Davies - who he could count on to provide a more balanced - ie Quebec / Rest of Canada Approach.
I predict Ms. Turmel will pander to the Quebec Caucus and in so doing will turn off the NDP base outside of that Province. Don't forget, it is that base which has stuck with the NDP through thick and thin. The others are simply new-comers who came on board through the unexpected collapse of the BLOC. It remains to be seen how long this new contingent will last but the smart money is that it will not survive the next Election.
In addition when we are speaking about Pandering - Turmel will naturally promote the welfare (?) of the Federal Public Service. Now there is a subject that will warm the hearts of the average Canadian.
So there you have it - some choice.
The odds from the beginning of Layton holding his motley crew together were long - his appointment of Turmel will simply make those odds impossible.
As I see it...
'K.D. Galagher'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)