That Canada has a Big ‘P’ on its forehead for ‘Patsy’.
In Today’s Liberal Organ, a.k.a. The Ottawa Citizen, Hugh Adami writes a column entitled ‘Canada Shrugs As Immigration Rulings Fracture A Family’.
Sounds awful … doesn’t it, but let’s dig a little deeper into the facts:
Mrs. age 69, was born and raised in the Soviet Union; Mr. age 70, in Cuba. They subsequently married and lived together in Cuba.
Last year, they made application to Canada’s Refugee Board both claiming Refugee Status and both were rightfully turned down.
Before I go further, you need to understand what is entailed in a Refugee Claim. Most immigrants coming to Canada come via the standard immigration application, that is to say, they apply in their home country to move and live in Canada for numerous reasons – to be with family, to better themselves economically etc.
But there is a tiny exception to the rule; a person who has a genuine fear of Persecution in their Home Country can apply within other Countries for Protection under the United Nations Convention for Refugees – that is to say, they can prove they will be Persecuted for Reasons of Race, Religion, Political Opinion and so on. Surprisingly, about 40,000 people per year make such a claim within Canada’s borders.
I worked for the Refugee Board and I suspect less than only 5% of claimants have a genuine claim – it is probably closer to 1 or 2%. The remainder are ‘cue jumpers’ – rather than apply the normal way to become an immigrant to Canada, they use the short-circuited route of making up false claims for Refugee Status.
This is what Mrs. and Mr. did in the case at hand. The Refugee Board correctly dismissed their claims and ordered them both deported – Mrs. to Russia since that is the citizenship she holds and Mr. back to Cuba – he being a citizen of that country.
Now the bleeding hearts.
Cuba arbitrarily refused to take Mr. back so we in Canada are stuck with him. If I were Harper, I would say to the Brothers Castro – you take back your life long citizen or we in Canada cease playing tourist on your beaches. I suspect that they would have him back on the next plane out.
But the Adami Article article really focuses on the Mrs. – the Russian Citizen. Russia will take her back but according to the family she no longer has any ties in that country. I wonder if that statement could withstand scrutiny but say it is true – so what? He is Cuban and she is Russian and neither are entitled Refugee Status. To compound the issue is the fact that Mrs. is in poor health and I need not point out to you that our Health System is now collapsing under its own weight.
The Bottom-line here is why is it Canada’s responsibility to step forward and be the boy scout in this sad but all too frequent a situation?
We always seem to be cast as such.
In the Mahar case, the United States sent him to Syria where he was allegedly tortured but Canada coughed up a cool $10 million dollars for his pain and suffering.
In the current Kahdr case, he cowardly killed a US Medic who left behind a widow and 2 orphans. And yet, it is Canada he sues and if history repeats itself, he too will likely hit the $million dollar Canadian Jackpot.
So dear reader, I leave it to you to decide what is the right thing to do in regard to Mrs. Russia and Mr. Cuba.
As for me, I would probably reluctantly give in and let them both stay here. But it does make you, as a Canadian, feel used.
I would also like to think that some of our left wing papers would at least be a little more balanced when reporting on such cases – they treat each case like it was the only one – i.e. no big deal – but it is a big deal since, as I said in the beginning, 10s of thousands are making similar requests yearly without the facts to support their claims. The columnists should drop their inflammatory words and admit that the issue is not so cut and dry.
In the end, if we say let them all stay regardless of the facts – then at least shut down the Refugee Board to save a few quid. We’ll need the money.
As I see it…
‘K.D. Galagher’