A Look Back Over 2011...

In regard to My Predictions For This Year.

But first, did you know that I completed 138 Blogs in 2011? And since the beginning - on July 6, 2009 - I have written 241 of the little devils.

Thought you might find that of interest. I enjoyed every moment.

Now for my prognostications for this year just ending:

Elections -

a) Federal and Ontario Provincial

• I predicted that both Harper and Hudak would win elections this year - Harper with a minority and Hudak with I majority. Wrong on both counts though Harper did win and won by a majority.
• I indicated that the Federal Election would take place this past Spring - which it did. And of note, I had been predicting the Spring 2011 Election Date for the past 2 + years.

correct, +1.5 points wrong, -2 points

b) USA

• I predicted that Mitt Romney would come out of 2011 in the lead for the GOP - and he has. I also predicted that the Tea Party would remain a force in 2011 - which it has.

correct, +2 points

c) Britain

• I said that the Tories would be forced into another Election - I was wrong. wrong, - 1 point

d) Italy

• I predicted that PM Berlusconi would be gone - I was right. correct; 1 point

The Economy

a) USA

• I predicted it would continue to decline due to its horrendous debt - and it has. no brainer - no points

b) Canadian Dollar

• said it would stay above par - and it has not. wrong; -1 point

c) Canadian Economy

• would out perform the US - it did. correct; + 1 point

d) European Contagion

• would continue to spread across Europe and would begin to affect America's ratings - and it has. Plus even our dear Province of Ontario is now on a negative credit watch. correct; + 1 point

e) Interest Rates

• I predicted that 5 year mortgage rates would rise to 5-6%. - wrong - they remained flat; - 1 point

f) Oil

• that it would average $100 a barrel - and it has. correct; + 1 point

g) Gold / Silver / Copper

• that they would reach record levels - and they did albeit are now on a temporary downward trend.

they did reach record levels but are now in decline - no points awarded.

h) China

• will continue to lead the pack - it did no brainer - no points

i) Over Legislation / Regulation

• will begin to slow - it has but remains in its infancy too small to register, no points

j) Number of Civil Servants - salaries

• will begin to reverse - it has but it too remains in its infancy too small to register - no points

k) Social Welfare Programs

• will begin to decline - they have declined big time in Europe and have just begun to decline in North Am. as I did not specify Europe - no points awarded

World Affairs

a) Terrorism will continue with softer targets - it has. correct, but almost a no brainer; +.5 of a point

b) Haiti plus Africa will continue to suffer - they have. no brainer - no points

c) Afghanistan to stalemate - it has. same here - no brainer - no points

d) Iran big story plus no regime change - right on both counts. correct; 1 point

e) North Korea - will continue to be majorly in the news for 2011 - it has been but primarily due to Dear Leader's death which I did not foresee. wrong; 1 point

f) Russia will continue to decline into dictatorship under Putin - it has. no brainer - no points

g) Airport and Border Security will continue to thicken - it has. no brainer - no points

h) Democracies will be upstaged by Communist / Dictatorship Governments - they have not. wrong; - 1 point

i) Immigration Backlash - rise of right wing in Europe to neutralize Muslim effect - it has. no brainer...

j) Persecution against Christians and Jews to accelerate - it has. correct; + 1 point

Generally Speaking

A most difficult year - greater civil unrest - it has been that. all and all 2011 was a most sh..ty year +1 point.

Final Tally: 11 Correct and 7 Wrong. Not So Good.

For Next Year's List, which I will post before Jan, 1, 2012, I will try to do better and I will also try to avoid predicting on the 'no brainers'.

As I see it....

'K.D. Galagher'

It's Official ......

The Race for the US Presidency, 2012 - 2016 is over !!

Well perhaps not 'officially over' but as good as.

And the Winner is ............'Mitt Romney'.

That is unless he a) dies before Election Day or b) is found in bed with a dozen other men. (women he would probably get away with).

So 'Mormon Mitt' is the West's new guy for the next four (4) years.

None of the 8 or so Republican challengers can hold a candle to him and Obama has made so many mistakes, even any one of those eight would have given him a good run for his money.

But in many respects, Mormon Mitt has it all.

He even looks the part !!

He has experience in business; as Governor of Massachusetts, he has experience running a major government and he knows his way around the Foreign Affairs files.

And unlike his main Republican Rival - Newt Gingrich and the Current Occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, he works well with others (i.e. he is not a one man band); an essential attribute if one is to be a successful President in a Government composed of Checks and Balances.

So you have heard it here first. Look at all the wear and tear and worrying I have saved you awaiting the formal results next November.

I plan to do my usual prognostication for the up coming year but wanted to get this most important one out of the way first.

As I see it....

'K.D. Galagher'

What to do about Syria

Readers will know that I was not a fan of the West getting involved in the Arab Spring when it came to either Egypt or Libya.

That does not hold though in the case of Syria.

How so?

First, in regard to the Arab Spring - it was obvious to me that we were really dealing with an Arab Winter. The Dictators - as bad as they were - were less of a problem than what is replacing them - that is to say Extreme Islamists. Citizens of these two countries - the moderate muslims and the non-muslims will soon look back on the days of the Dictators as Utopia - sad as that is to say. Indeed, it is already happening while we in the West stand helplessly by.

So why should Syria be treated differently?

Syria along with Iran and North Korea are a Triumvirate of Rogue States. Most problematic is the fact that each wants to be a Nuclear Power - North Korea already has the Bomb - Iran is on the cusp - assuming it does not already have it and Syria is continually working toward it.

Simply stated - the three countries are just too dangerous to leave to their own devices.

Permit me to digress at this point.

In the First Gulf War, I supported 'Bush I' when he decided to leave Saddam Hussein in place as a strategic check on Iran.

I then mistakenly supported 'Bush II' when he went after the same Saddam Hussein after the bombing of the Twin Towers extending to him the benefit of the doubt that Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction that needed taking out.

I was wrong to have done that since I knew too that the Triumvirate of Evil even back then were the Three Rogue Powers noted above.

Rather than Iraq, - Bush the Younger should have targeted Iran - the most dangerous of the Three.

We have now lost a decade and nothing has been gained but much has been lost.

Iraq is swinging quickly over to the Islamists, Afghanistan will do so when the US pulls out as it must eventually do.

Korea's Nuclear capability gets stronger each year and it is only a matter of time when Iran joins the Nuclear Club.

Ant the Middle East is quickly transforming into an Islamist Paradise.

The only country that is on the ropes is dear olde Syria and we in the West should move in now to make sure that any of its weaponry does not fall into the hands of those even more antagonistic to our way of life.

But Dear Reader - it is not too late - even at this 11th hour. We could still move to neutralize the Threesome but I fear we in the West lack the Will (ability?) to do so.

Europe is engaged in an economic melt down, America is stalled in a recession with a President who lives in la la land.

That leaves Israel, South Korea, Canada and perhaps a demilitarized Japan.

Where is a strong vibrant NATO when it's needed?

As I see it...

Where is the Outrage ???

In regard to Peter MacKay's recent junket to Afghanistan - during his Christmas Holidays no less and once again needlessly employing DND Assets to ferry himself there.

We all remember the recent hullabaloo over his calling in a S & R Helicopter to extricate him from his fishing hole during an earlier holiday. Why you'd have thought the guy had committed high treason.

And now he is so thick - he's done it again - this time during his Christmas holidays - indeed on Christmas Day itself. Does he never learn?

And does he not realize that Christmas is a time for family - surrounded by a roaring fire with one's favourite drink?

Not good enough for MacKay obviously - he wants to spend his well deserved holiday with his troops in a god forsaken desert. What's wrong with the guy.

If he could only have walked there - all this might be excusable, but his taking Military Aircraft is simply inexcusable.

The above is of course tongue in cheek - but is meant to support my thesis that the Minister of Defence is on duty 365 days a year (366 in a Leap Yr) 24 hours per day.

This is the same Peter MacKay who took his precious time to undergo Military Boot Camp Training so he could better understand our military.

As a student of history and no youngster myself, I cannot recall a better Minister of Defence in Canada's History.

As I see it...

'K. D. Galagher'

More Inanity...

When it comes to Modern Communication.

Recently I wrote a Blog on the senselessness of telephone answering messages that do not identify the phone's owner - especially in the case of Commercial Establishments - i.e. you have reached number xyz 111-2222 please leave a message and we will get back to you as quickly as possible ... tone ....

Now I have encountered a similar situation, this involving my aged Aunt and my attempts to contact one of her health insurance providers to find out why her reimbursements have suddenly ceased.

Here goes:

First the usual mechanical voice overs and various prompts telling me how important my call is to them and that they consistently bend over backwards to provide first class service. Ultimately I am connected with a real person - let's call her Mary J; infact, that is what she calls herself.

I give Mary the background leading to my call at which point she advises me that she cannot speak to me - she must, for privacy reasons, only communicate with my Aunt.

I tell her I can understand her position but it would save everyone time and inconvenience if I could be told what the issue is regarding her ceased payments. I tell her that I suspect it is due to them not being advised of my Aunt's recent move - but again - the stock answer - they can only deal directly with my Aunt. This same Aunt who has no idea that her payments have stopped or for that matter, what her new address is.

But seeing that I am getting nowhere - I disclose that I have Power of Attourney and we agree that I will send Mary J a copy at which point they will be able to deal with me directly too.

What's your e-mail address I ask? Mary J "we are not allowed to give that information out".

Okay - what's your fax number? Mary J provides me with a 1-800 fax number.

And what is your full name so I can direct my fax to your attention? Mary J "we are not allowed to give that out either - only our first name and the first initial of our family name".

Okay - I will send a fax to you 'Mary J'.

May I have your direct telephone extension so I can call you afterward to make sure it gets to you?

You can guess - "not allowed to give that information out"

I send the Fax.

A few days go by and nothing.

I call Insurance Provider at its main 1-800 number and get the following recording:

"If you know the extention of the person you are calling - dial it now. If you do not, press #5 for a list of our staff directory".

Of course I have neither.

Eventually, I reach the company operator and explain the difficulty I am having tracking 'Mary J' down.

The Operator asks me for Mary's full name. I explain, feeling quite silly, that all I have is the first initial of her last name as in 'J'.

Operator tells me that she is unable to find 'Mary J' in her list of employees.

I ask the Operator to connect me with Mary J's area of work and in due course end up speaking with 'Bonny B'.

Bonny does not know a Mary J either and in response to my disbelief - she explains that there are many employees in their section; "she cannot possibly know them all".

I ask Bonny B if their section has received my fax of several days ago?

Bonny then proceeds to scold me for sending a fax to them - "we have several fax numbers how could you possibly know which one to send it too" she snarled.

Finally, I start to lose it. In a gruff voice I punt back - 'your Mary J gave me the number and asked me to use it, so I did;.

Bonny pulls in her horns.

She puts me on hold and then gets back to advise that there is no record on my Aunt's file that my fax has been received. Would I mind sending it again?

"To Bonny B" - I reply. 'Yes', says Bonny - as we are not allowed to give our last name.

And the fax number you are reluctant to give out would be? Bonny B provides me with a different one than was provided in the first instance by Mary J.

And I take it there is no telephone number available for direct follow up with you? "Correct".

Then how will I ever know that one or both of my faxes have been received? "Keep calling our main line until someone here confirms receipt" she responds.

Later that day I receive a voice mail message from Mary J - you remember her - my first contact. Mary just wanted to let me know that she was in receipt of my fax. I wondered to myself if it was fax 1 or fax 2 - but was thankful that at least one of them had gotten through and that she had taken the time to let me know. I know I am unlikely to get a similar call from Bonny B.

So after all that, I still have no idea why the reimbursements stopped but a least I think I am making some progress?

So there you have it - Communications in our Modern World. I am beginning to think though, that a return to Carrier Pigeons may be in order.

As I see it...

'K.D. Galagher'

Be On The Look Out For ....

A Little Olde Lady With A Sign.

She is most dangerous - she has to be, since she has spent 10 years behind bars !!!

This criminal goes by the alias - 'Linda Gibbons' and don't let her grandmotherly looks fool you, she will stand too close to a doorway at the drop of a hat; a Morgentaler abortion doorway that is.

Just this Friday she was at it again - standing too close to Morgentaler's - with her sign no less and it took 5 - count them - five well armed gendarmes armed to the teeth, to subdue her. Hands shackled behind her back.

Despite the fact that she made no move whatsoever to resist. She must have a black belt in something or other.

And this particular arrest is simply bizzare. Just this past week, Linda Gibbons appeared before the Highest Court of the Realm - the Supreme Court of Canada and argued that our Criminal Justice System was treating her unfairly. A decision is now pending.

This alone should have brought the judicial vendetta against her to a halt until the Court renders its decision. I have seen traffic violation cases brought to such a halt in similar circumstances but sadly, not so for poor Ms. Gibbons.

What a State we live in. Real Criminals get a slap on the wrist and dear olde Ms. Gibbons gets the book thrown at her again and again.

Indeed, we can all relate to stories where perpetrators of violence receive light sentences and I have the following one for you.

A few years back, a brother of a chap I worked with was unceremoniously shot for refusing to by a thug a beer. The brother had been out celebrating the receipt of Canada Revenue refund cheque and had been liberally buying others drinks. When he wanted to leave to go home - the thug insisted he buy him another beer. And when refused, he shot him.

The Thug got 4 years and was out in two for good behaviour - despite the cold bloodedness of his killing. I have often wondered how many others have been struck down in his path since.

Even while awaiting trial this Thug placed numerous calls to the victim's family bragging how he had gunned down their son and brother. Where is the death penalty when you need it?

Anyway, Thug gets 4 years and is out in two - little olde lady carrying sign - 10 years - all of it served.

It is like living in a dream world.

And then you have riots, sit-ins and violent protests where numerous fringe nut bars deliberately break the law and receive no censure at all. Probably the worst example is in Caledonia where natives have beaten and assaulted law abiding, tax paying citizens while the police and our government officials - including most notably, our Esteemed Premier McGuinty - watch on in mute silence.

So now back to Linda Gibbons. We live in a society that prides itself on peaceful freedom of assembly and speech and here we have a lady who is troubled by assembly line abortion and all she wants to do is hold her little sign up near the entrance to the assembly line.

One of Morgentaler's minions whines "why should we put up with that (Linda and her sign) most people can't imagine what's that like...it's not a nice feeling". Poor woman, but is this not what freedom of speech is all about to make others uncomfortable by challenging their strongly held beliefs? Democracy is not comfortable.

And what about the discomfort the little baby feels when his or her young life is so violently taken.

Count me with Linda Gibbons - she is a true Martyr of our Sorry Times.

As I see it....

'K.D. Galagher'

They Just Are Not Listening...

To our Esteemed Premier, Dalton McGuinty - that is.

The "They" are the Province's Auditor General, Moodies Credit Agency and the entire German Government.

As many of you will know, I did not vote for the McGuinty Liberals in the recent election because I did not believe what he was saying - e.g. that Green Energy was creating jobs and that Ontario's economy was the best in the land and so on.

Post Election I realized I had been wrong on the basis that how could I have possibly been right when our dear Premier returned to power with a virtual majority - the voter had to be right and conversely, I had to be wrong.

So since then, I have fallen in line behind our dear Leader and now accept what he is telling us without reservation.

Now that leads me to the "They" in this piece.

How is that they are not listening to Premier McGuinty and accepting at face value what he has to say?

Let's take the AG first. His recent report is scathing on a number of fronts but almost a quarter of the report is devoted to the 'scam' of green energy. Get this - the AG says the Green Energy plan 'was not thought out - costs billions of wasted dollars and for every job it creates 2 to 3 jobs in the private sector are lost'.

The nerve of the man. Where do they come from - and I would bet you a donut to a dollar that he is not even bilingual.

But as you can see - he is just so out of touch with reality.

I would though like to focus in on one of his spurious claims - that being for every green job - two or three private sector jobs are lost. I say that because if what is being said in some circles that no green jobs - esp. lasting jobs - are being created - then you private sector jobs be lost? McGuinty needs to point this out in his rebuttal to the AG's Report - but I digress.

And then you have Germany announcing this week that it is scuttling its Green Energy Plan - it does not work - they say -it only has resulted in lost money and jobs. What do they know and their new position is certainly out of step with our Divine Leader.

Germany, as many of you will know, was the European Leader in Green Energy and was regularly referenced as a model for Ontario to follow. For them to claim now that it was a complete failure borders on the treasonous.

Anyway they are simply out to lunch.

And then there is Moodies. How dare them.

They have placed Ontario on a 'Negative Credit Watch'. A Negative Credit Watch - why this is the same Province that only months ago - in those pre Election -when in the words of our Esteemed Leader - Ontario was creating jobs at a record pace and was out performing every other Province economically.

(I know - he did not dwell on Ontario's new found 'Have Not Status' but give the guy a break).

He told it like it is and it is for this reason I just do not understand where Moodies gets off. It's a conspiracy - I tell you.

But there you have it dear readers - Our Esteemed Leader being maligned once again by more and more Lies.

And How Do I Know?

Why McGuinty Told Me So.

As I see it...

'K.D. Galagher'